Decision making

    Why isn't there an option to renovate facilities (addressing meeting space, installing windows and updating air-conditioning) and building a theatre on site or purchasing the UniSA Magill theatre – this would be the least cost to ratepayers?

    Council considered an office renovation as part of the Options considered at its meeting on the 1 July 2025. However, Council determined that a renovation would not address all the issues in a cost effective manner in the long term and therefore resolved to consult the Community on constructing a new building.

    Can you please explain to the Community what the confidential plans developed with Alinea prior to any public consultation actually entailed, and why this information was deliberately withheld from residents while they were being asked for their 'ideas'?

    Council had not, and still has not, made a decision about proceeding with any of the Alinea Group models, so it would have been premature and inappropriate to be discussing options that Council had not formally considered.   Furthermore, these high level conceptual ideas were ‘commercial in confidence’ and to ensure Council has the best opportunity to obtain the most favourable outcome through an expression of interest process, should Council proceed down that path, this was the action that needed to be taken.  

    The aim of the Alinea consultation was to seek feedback from the Community about what they may like to see on the 172 Montacute Road site, to guide the next steps in the process.  

    It was a consultation to give the Community an opportunity to be creative with their ideas for the site, and to help shape our Community Heart, not a consultation based on a number of possible options (as per the current consultation).

    Please clarify whether Option C (with up to a 12-storey residential tower on the site) is a directive from the State Government, or a Council-initiated plan that sought retrospective support from the State to enable a pre-existing high-rise ambition.

    The potential 12 storey tower was not a directive from the State Government; it was identified as a potential solution by the Alinea group (they identified 8 to 12 storeys) to enable the scope and scale of development on this site to assist Council to significantly reduce the costs associated with constructing a new Council Office and Performing Arts Centre, with the desired outcome of minimising impact to ratepayers.

Operational arrangements

    What happens to the Council office whilst the site redeveloped (workers, office, Council Chambers)?

    If Option A or B are selected, depending on the location of the buildings, Council operations may be able to continue in the current office until the new office is completed.  If Option C is chosen, this may also be a possibility.

    If Staff need to be relocated many of them will go to existing Council sites including The ARC Campbelltown, Council Depot and Library. It is not envisaged that Council would need to rent any additional office space through the build.

     

    What happens to regular hirers of the Function Centre?

    Regular hirers will be consulted on their future needs and space requirements.   It is anticipated that they will be accommodated in the new building or in another existing Council facility if the Function Centre is demolished.

Financial Considerations

    How does Council avoid any potential future escalating cost to rate payers due to any leasing arrangement in perpetuity if the land is sold?

    If Option C is endorsed by Council as its preferred option, then Council will protect its interest to the extent possible regarding any leasing arrangements (ie if the Expression of Interest process proposes a lease be entered into).

    What relocation costs will be incurred on top of the building costs for the duration of building given that building often takes longer and costs more than anticipated?

    If Option A or B are selected, depending on the location of the buildings, Staff may be able to stay in the current office until the new office is completed.  If Option C is chosen, this may also be a possibility. If Staff need to be relocated many of them will go to existing Council sites including The ARC Campbelltown, Council Depot and Library. It is not envisaged that Council would need to rent any additional office space through the build.

    Was the 'cost neutral' statement in the previous consultation a misrepresentation designed to secure favourable public responses?

    Council ‘seeking to deliver the project at a neutral to limited cost to ratepayers’ is a correct representation, and also in line with the Council decision.  This is why the Alinea Group were engaged to develop models that could be as cost neutral or as limited cost to ratepayers as possible.   

    It is clear in the Council report of 1 July 2025 and in the current Consultation Document that building say, a new Council office and a Performing Arts Centre is far more economical for ratepayers when there is investor contribution, than it is simply by using Council funds. The rate impact to ratepayers is also lower under the investor model. However, it needs to be reiterated that Council has made no decision to proceed with any option at this time and needs Community feedback to establish its next steps.


Land ownership/requirements

    Are the Council Chambers at 172 Montacute Road situated on Community Land owned by the Crown or a Fee Simple Certificate of Title?

    Council purchased the property from a private owner ‘Peter Franzon & Sons Proprietary Limited’ on 23 June 1965 and holds the Certificate of Title for this land (CT 2121/44).

    If it was on Community land previously, when was it transferred to a C/T and was public consultation undertaken and approval obtained?

    This land has never been Community land.  When the Local Government Act 1999 commenced on 1 January 2000, it required Councils to identify land to be exempted from community land as per Section 193(1)(a) of the Act as follows:

     (1)       All local government land (except roads) that is owned by a council or under a      council's care, control and management at the commencement of this section (the   commencement date) is taken to have been classified as community land unless—

    (a)     the council resolves to exclude the land from classification as community land within three years after the commencement date; and

     (b)    the land is unaffected by provisions of a reservation, dedication, trust or other                   instrument that would prevent or restrict its alienation.

     On 5 June 2000, Council resolved:

     ‘To give notice In Govt Gazette Its Resolution To Exclude Various Land From Classification As Community Land Under Sec 34 Subsection (3) Of Local Govt Act 1999.’

    Council undertook public consultation on the land exclusions as required by Section 193(2) of the Act and resolved on 2 December 2002, to exclude a number of parcels of land from being classified Community Land which included 168 and 172 Montacute Road.

    Is Council intending to use its compulsory acquisition powers to purchase land on Julia Drive?

    No

    Who will own the land regarding each of the new options being considered?

    Council will own the land for Option A and B. In Option C, Council will not own the land where there is any residential development on the site. The value of this land will be a contribution towards the cost of construction of the Office and Performing Arts Centre (PAC) buildings. Council may own the land where the Council Office and PAC are located. Land ownership in Option C will be explored through an Expression of Interest response with Council making the final decision on this.

Trees

    How many trees will need to be removed for each option?

    For each option, Council would seek a building design that minimises tree removal. New landscaping, including tree planting to replace trees that were removed, would be undertaken following construction of a new building.

    Option A - This option would have the least impact on tree removal, potentially requiring the removal of one significant tree.

    Option B - This option would potentially require the removal of one to two significant trees.

    Option C - This option would potentially require the removal of three significant trees

Community Consultation arrangements

    I don’t live in the Council area – can I still have a say on this project?

    Yes, you are welcome to participate in the consultation.  Council’s Public Consultation Policy supports people who live, study or conduct business in, or who visit, use or enjoy the services, facilities and public places of the City of Campbelltown participating in consultation opportunities, including the Creating our Community Heart consultation.

    Can the survey/consultation process period be extended to give more ratepayers time to respond with increased notification (eg in the rates reminder notices)?

    The consultation period is a 5 week consultation period, closing on 3 November 2025, which is 2 weeks longer than Council’s usual consultation period.

    Council has undertaken extensive advertising of the consultation prior to it commencing, and further promotion and awareness raising is planned during the consultation period. A reminder notice will be included in Snippet (rates notice) that is being distributed in the last week of October.

    How will the results of the survey be presented?

    Results will be presented at an open Council meeting, anticipated to be in December 2025, including demographic information, how people are connected to the consultation and the full details (ie number and percentage) of support for each option. Qualitative feedback (ie written responses) for each question will be themed to make it easier for Elected Members to understand the sentiment of responses.

    Is it appropriate that Council go ahead with ideas based on consultation outcomes if minimal ratepayers have responded rather than extend the time and add new processes for response?

    It is not an acceptable practice for Councils to extend consultation timeframes once a consultation process has commenced, however once a consultation has concluded and results have been received, Council can choose to consult further if it wishes.  

    In relation to the Community Hub consultation, Council has committed to an extensive consultation process including distributing consultation materials to every ratepayer and resident. This is an expensive process that will provide every opportunity possible for people to participate over a 5 week period to achieve as much feedback as possible.  

    Is there a number or percentage of ratepayers that need to agree to an option of the proposed redevelopment of the Council Office & Chambers before it is adopted by Council?

    There is no set number or percentage of ratepayers required for Council to make a decision on any matter. However, Elected Members must comply with Behavioural Standards set by the Minister for Local Government Act and Section 75E of the Act, and ‘Act in a manner that is consistent with the Council’s role as a representative, informed and responsible decision maker, in the interests of its community.’.

    How are you going to ensure that survey questions are not framed in such a way as to elicit particular responses? ie avoiding closed questions and having open questions.

    The consultation uses a combination of open and closed questions. The questions are designed to help Elected Members understand the degree of change in the precinct that is preferred by the Community that respond to the consultation.  The preliminary question in the survey will enable Staff to analyse the data through different lenses, thereby supporting Council in understanding the perceptions of each group of respondents in relation to the options.

    The questions have been framed using simple and direct phrasing to encourage as many people as possible in the Community to respond to the survey without being influenced to provide support for a particular option.

    The open questions also enable people to provide any feedback that they wish Council to consider.

    Who is conducting this consultation – Council or a private company?

    Council is undertaking the consultation.

    Have the Councillors contributed to the questions in the consultation questionnaire?

    Council resolved at its meeting on 1 July 2025 that the consultation document be presented at a briefing session in August and then to the following Council meeting for the Elected Members’ approval prior to being distributed. Therefore, the Elected Members had the opportunity to review the draft consultation questionnaire at a Briefing Session and provide feedback, prior to Staff preparing a report to confirm the consultation approach and documentation (presented to the 2 September Council meeting) for approval.   The Council adopted the consultation methodology and survey questions prior to the consultation document being distributed.

    Does the consultation include the financial figures provided by Alinea (the Alinea Group conducted the 2024 precinct consultation) or will Council provide their own?

    Financial figures provided in the Consultation Document were sourced from those provided in the Council report. The Council report included figures from the Alinea Group for the models they were involved in, and Staff prepared Long Term Financial Plan models for all of the options.  Full financials (including the impact on rates) and the associated long term financial plans are available from the Key Documents section of consultation webpage and Council's website.

    Can I respond to this consultation if I don’t support any option? Why isn’t there an Option D ‘Do Nothing’ in this consultation?

    Yes, you are welcome to respond and advise Council via Q4 ‘Do you have any other comments’ that your preference is for Council not to select any of the options and why.

    Council considered adding an option to ‘do nothing’, however as the consultation is to find out the Community’s preferred option from the 3 options Council resolved to consult on to help guide future decision making if Council decides to go ahead with a project, it was decided that a ‘do nothing’ option should not be included in the consultation choices.

    Can I inspect the existing building to get a better understanding of why it is being proposed for demolition?

    Instead of this approach, Council has prepared a video providing information about the state of the current office building.